The Current State of 3G
January 10, 2007, 12:36 PM
Scott Fulton, BetaNews: When the iPhone was announced, a number of people expressed disappointment that it didn't support 3G. Some general-press journalists attending Macworld yesterday asked some members of the crowd on hand why they were disappointed, and in getting the response that there was no 3G...they learned there was something called "3G." Granted, we've been writing on 4G during CES week, but we asked our senior CES analyst, Sharon Fisher, to fill us in on what the iPhone is supposedly missing.
Sharon Fisher, BetaNews Senior CES Analyst: 3G, for "third-generation," is an international standard for wireless broadband. Globally, it's called International Mobile Telecommunications 2000, or IMT2000; one of the common specifications for it is called Wideband Code Division Multiple Access, or WCDMA. In Europe, it's called Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, or UMTS. So you can see why most people just call it "3G."
What 3G gives you is access to video and faster access to data. The complication in the U.S. is that 3G uses a different spectrum and so wireless providers have had to build new networks on top of their existing ones. You need a special phone to take advantage of 3G services, but existing phones can continue to work over 3G.
Cingular, which is the exclusive carrier for the iPhone in the U.S., only has 3G available in major metropolitan areas. For example, it's not available in Idaho, where I live, at all, though it is available in Indianapolis. In New York State, it's only available in New York City. T-Mobile said in November that it's going to roll out 3G service to 100 major metropolitan areas in 2007. Verizon launched a network in 2002 that is available in 223 major metropolitan areas and 141 airports in the U.S.
However, 3G is much more heavily used in Europe and Asia. Since Steve Jobs said that 3G would be available in the future, and that the iPhone would be available worldwide in 2008, it's a safe bet that it will have 3G before worldwide deployment.
What the iPhone uses instead is EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution) to transmit data, which is a sort of hybrid of 2G and 3G that was set up when 3G wasn't quite solidified. EDGE is slower than 3G. For example, EDGE provides data speeds between 75 Kbps and 135 Kbps, while 3G can be up to 700 Kbps. So it doesn't support simultaneous voice and data calls. But EDGE is much more widely available – for example, the Cingular EDGE network is available in more than 13,000 cities and towns and in areas along 40,000 miles of highways.
So while people criticized Apple for using EDGE instead of 3G, if iPhone had supported 3G and stayed with Cingular, people would have been very limited in where they could take advantage of it, and most likely would have been limited to EDGE functionality in most areas anyway.
Scott Fulton: It would have been an iPhone with an asterisk that said, "Not available in some areas."
Sharon Fisher: Still, there's a number of people who were very disappointed that the iPhone doesn't support 3G.
Scott Fulton: And in a nutshell, that's because...
Sharon Fisher: Because they feel WiFi isn't extensive enough to be useful.
Scott Fulton: It all begins with technology, but in the end, it's all about feelings. Thanks again, Sharon.






Post a Comment
Comments
1. Posted by IceyKola on Jan 10, 2007 - 2:10 PM
I don't think any of that matters. People will want the phone no matter what. Who ever can afford it will buy one cause It just sleeker looking than anything on the market. Unfortunately the company I work for does not allow camera phones, so I'm stuck with a BlackBerry 7130e.
2. Posted by Sharp_Rulez on Jan 10, 2007 - 5:08 PM
Rogers Wireless (the only one GSM carrier in Canada) has a great EDGE network and just deployed an UMTS/HSPDA network last fall.
About the speed, its really easy to get 140kbps in EDGE, with a peak of 200kbps. In HSDPA, its about 1.5mbps, not 700kbps as written.
3. Posted by PostDeals on Jan 10, 2007 - 9:12 PM
Majority of the people that will be buying the phone have access to 3G area. No offence to those out in the country but they are lucky if they can get DSL let alone 3G.
100 million people live in the areas where 3G is already available, thats good enough reason to have a phone available with it.
I know because I switched from T-Mobile to Cingular just because they got the Cingular 8525 with 3G. I had been with T-Mobile for 6 years but they were too slow to implement it.
4. Posted by joe83 on Jan 11, 2007 - 7:50 AM
Im from Ireland and all our phones are mostly 3G, so im dissapointed Apple have not created a 3G compatible phone. I hope they lanch one before the end of the year.
5. Posted by iNsuRRecTiON on Jan 13, 2007 - 1:21 AM
Hey,
with UMTS/HSDPA you will get upto 14 mbps in it's latest configuration level.
We are now at the configuration level 2 (upto 3,6 mbps), configuration level 1 is upto 1,8 mbps..
best regards,
iNsuRRecTiON
6. Posted by Joseph_HSDPA on Jan 16, 2007 - 11:08 AM
I applaud Apple for not rushing into 3G just yet. It doesn't offer any immediate advantage. Yes there are ~100M 3G users out there, but the technology that allows a user to "hop" from one island to another is still GSM. Moreover, GSM technology is mature, single chip solutions are available with agrresive power consumption numbers to help with battery life issues.
As 3G continues to evolve the possibly better route would be to support VOIP thru the use of HSDPA. The present commercially available HSDPA throughput rates are at 7.2MBps.
Please note in "real" life for example, values less than a few MBps are visible. This highly depends on the Base Station's capability, Interference levels, and the capabilities of the Mobile. I am Happy that I now have to carry ONE device :-)